I’m about to get a new computer, and I need it to have Windows XP for compatibility issues (don’t argue with me on this lol). Anyway, I have a choice between a dual-core and a quad-core processor…I think I’m gonna go with quad core, but I have a few questions.
Say I’m doing four processor-intensive tasks at once, like scanning my computer for viruses, video editing, etc. Because the processor has four cores, in theory each task would be given its own core. Will Windows XP do this? I know that quad core is better for multitasking because it has more cores, but will Windows XP split tasks among the four cores well? Do I need some third party software to manage my processor to get the most out of it?
The basis of my question is, how well does XP interact with a quad core processor?
I understand the multithreading capabilities, and that the only way a single program can use more than a single core is if it is written to do so. My question is regarding multiple programs using a single core each.
So basically what I've heard here and researched is that XP is just as good as anything else in splitting up tasks by core, but multithreading is the responsibility of the program. Also, there are AMD problems in some processors, but I'm getting Intel so no worries.
Finally, dual core probably IS more bang for the buck, but I do a lot of multitasking so I'd rather have four cores. Anyone have anything else to add?
Also, money-wise, RAM is $16.30 on Newegg and a 500gb hard drive is $80, the only thing I'd need to save up for really is a better video card, but I don't do very much graphics-intensive gaming, and my quad core CPU will enable me to run my video editing programs and render things (it is multithreaded) over four 2.6ghz cores, so i really don't need a graphics card to boost it. Might be nice, maybe later
Related posts:
5 responses so far ↓
1 iRKED // Sep 7, 2008
Just as well as Vista, or any other operating system will. (The only issue I know with XP and multiple cores is with a certain line of AMD dual cores not scaling properly.)
Also realize, even if a program isn't designed for multiple cores, you still gain more multitasking options with a quadcore.
2 Joe W // Sep 7, 2008
It’s not an operating thing, it’s a motherboard thing.
WinXP, Vista or otherwise.
d;o)
3 Big Dave // Sep 7, 2008
Windows NT was able to use multi core processors very well…….windows XP is two versions on from that, does that answer it?
A lot depends on the design of the program running and whether it is correctly threaded to use multi processor machines
4 drew // Sep 7, 2008
Currently there are not many software programs that will utilize quadcore/multicore technology. I would stick with the duocore and spend money on your RAM, Video card, and HD. You will see the best performance upgrade with those.
5 LeMair // Sep 7, 2008
I’ve never benchmarked it or anything, but I’m using a quad core on XP professional and it appears to all run as it should with no thrid party enhancement.
And I’m with you on Vista, it’s a complete joke.
Leave a Comment